🔗 Share this article

Australia's bold move to ban social media access for those under 16 is creating waves around the globe. Lawmakers, child protection groups, and parents are watching closely to see if this tactic will become a template for countries abroad.

The European Movement

In Europe, a increasing number of nations are exploring comparable restrictions.

• Denmark has stated a ban on social media for youth below 15, with the prime minister arguing that phones and platforms are "stealing our children's childhood". The policy may be enacted soon.
• The Norwegian government is set to implement a access barrier of 15, highlighting the need to protect children from the "influence of the AI".
• Ireland is introducing a digital ID system to verify the age and identity of social media users. Officials have indicated that an Australia-style ban is "a potential tools under consideration".
• In Spain, the leader has called on lawmakers to approve a proposal increasing the legal age for using social media to 16.
• In The French government, the head of state has threatened a ban for those under fifteen, and a government panel has recommended a similar move, potentially involving an overnight "screen time restriction" for 15- to 18-year-olds.
• The government in The Dutch government has advised guardians to restrict their children from social media until 15.

Across the European Union, the bloc's legislature has approved a non-binding resolution demanding a ban for under-16s without a parent decides otherwise is given. Even though it cautions of the "habit-forming" nature of these platforms, the move does not create mandatory rules.

"A strong age limit is a good foundation," stated one European lawmaker behind the measure.

Britain: A Watchful Eye

For the United Kingdom, the government has remained open to a potential ban, emphasizing that "no measure is off the table" but maintaining any decision must be "supported by robust research".

Previously, interest grew behind a bill to introduce limits on social media use by teenagers, but it was eventually modified. However, the administration vowed to investigate the matter.

Campaign organizations have expressed apprehensions. A prominent charity set up by the family of a girl who died after encountering dangerous social media material argues that a blanket age ban might not improve online safety and could lead to a "cliff edge" of risk when teens reach the legal age.

"The Australian ban is a answer to the failure of the social media companies to create tools that are secure and age appropriate for young users," commented a prominent peer.

The US: A Decentralized Picture

In the United States, regulation is largely occurring at the regional government level against a backdrop of country-wide gridlock.

• Utah requires parental consent for minors to use social media and limits overnight use.
• The state of Florida has passed a measure prohibiting children under fourteen from accessing social media, though it is entangled in constitutional disputes.
• Virginia has passed a rule restricting under-16s to a single hour of social media use per day, with additional time requiring parental permission.
• The state of Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have likewise passed bills mandating adult authorization for teenagers to set up social media accounts.

Despite widespread concern and proposals from certain politicians to follow the Australian example, a US-wide ban is right now seen as unlikely.

Worldwide Perspectives

Outside of the West, further states are similarly considering moves.

• The Malaysian government aims to restrict social media for teenagers effective next year.
• Brazil has lifted the required age for one major platform to 16.

Yet, global agencies strike a more cautious stance. Unicef has cautioned that age-based restrictions pose dangers and "could backfire". The organization points out that online platforms can be a "vital connection" for isolated youth and that regulation should not be a "replacement" for platform operators to prioritize child safeguards.

As this global discussion unfolds, the policies of this nation and others show that governments internationally are increasingly content to stand by for platforms to act voluntarily.